Here we come to the end of our three-part discussion of the Calvinist TULIP. Looking back, we see that total depravity was easy to affirm, as the Bible is explicit in describing humankind\u2019s inability to merit salvation through works. Conversely, unconditional election was easy to denounce, as receiving the benefit of election in Scripture is always conditioned on faith. And, contrary to Calvinist claims, saving faith is not something predestined by God for a select few to receive, but a capacity to trust in God for salvation that is granted to all. Limited atonement was perhaps the simplest to refute, as it undermines God\u2019s atonement for the entire world in Christ and His will to see all of humanity saved.<\/p>\n
Of the five points in the TULIP, the last two are the most difficult to navigate. Irresistible grace<\/em> and perseverance of the saints<\/em> call for a more delicate handling because they invite us into the mysterious and boundless realms of God\u2019s amazing grace. As P.\u202fE. Hughes says, \u201cIt is important always to remember that the operation of God\u2019s grace is a deep mystery that is far beyond our limited human comprehension.\u201d Thus, let us tiptoe carefully through the remainder of the TULIP.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n In Calvinism, those who have been elected by God to receive His efficacious and sufficient grace for salvation cannot reject it. Rather, they will in every case receive His grace by the faith predestined for them to exercise. While our fourth statement of faith notes that salvation is by God\u2019s grace and received through faith, there is nothing in our statement to indicate that God\u2019s grace is \u201cirresistible.\u201d What does Scripture say?<\/p>\n As with each topic addressed by the TULIP, proponents and opponents quote proof texts to support their view. However, when it comes to irresistible grace, Calvinists rely more on a series of logical syllogisms than they do on scriptural support. A logical syllogism uses connections between various premises to reach a conclusion. If A and B are true, then C must be true. The main line of reasoning for irresistible grace is as follows: What is lacking in the Calvinist argument is explicit biblical support for its claims that grace and faith are predestined for a select few and that humans cannot resist or reject the will of God regarding their salvation. Indeed, as we\u2019ve shown in past articles, Scripture actually indicates that grace and faith have been extended to all<\/em> humanity and that humans can, in fact, reject<\/em> God\u2019s desire for them to be saved.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n This concept of resistible<\/em> grace is evident in Paul\u2019s ministry and writing. Paul speaks of God\u2019s grace, expressed in Christ\u2019s sacrifice, as being something offered to all humanity (Romans 5:15-21; Titus 2:11). This accords nicely with Paul\u2019s concept of the atonement being offered to all (2\u202fCorinthians 5:17-21). And yet, as we know, not everyone receives the benefit of God\u2019s saving grace expressed in Jesus Christ.<\/p>\n Beyond that, Paul expresses his concern on numerous occasions that those who had already received God\u2019s saving grace would make it of no effect in their lives! In Acts 13:43, Paul and Barnabas urged new believers to \u201ccontinue in the grace of God,\u201d and Paul had to plead with the Corinthian believers not to receive the grace of God in vain (2 Corinthians 6:2). Paul was seriously concerned that some believers in Galatia were turning away from God, who had called them in the grace of Christ, because they were being drawn to a false gospel (Galatians 1:6ff). In his impassioned testimony, Paul stated that he did not set aside the grace of God, for if righteousness came through the law, then Christ died in vain (2:21). Sadly, some of the Galatian believers had taken the opposite course and, seeking to be justified by the works of the law, had severed themselves from Christ and thus had \u201cfallen from grace\u201d (5:4).<\/p>\n If Paul believed that God\u2019s saving grace was irresistible and effectual in the case of every Christian, then the passages above become nonsensical. This is to say nothing of the various places where Paul and other New Testament authors express concern for their own Christian progress, and the progress of their fellow Christians, without explicitly referring to grace, but certainly having the concept in mind.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Recognizing that grace is not irresistible leads us to the final point of the TULIP: perseverance of the saints<\/em>. The Calvinist doctrine of perseverance is concisely stated in the Westminster Confession of Faith (1647): \u201cThey whom God hath accepted in his Beloved, effectually called and sanctified by his Spirit, can neither totally nor finally fall away from the state of grace; but shall certainly persevere therein to the end, and be eternally saved.\u201d<\/p>\n Once more, one searches our Statement of Faith in vain for any such assurance. One also searches Scripture in vain. Instead, we find two types of passages regarding the perseverance of the saints. On one hand, we find those promising that God will remain ever faithful to those who place their faith in Him. On the other hand, we find repeated calls and warnings for those who have placed their faith in Him to continue to believe. If one looks only at the former set of passages, then they could hold to perseverance of the saints. But an honest reading of the latter set warns us that God\u2019s faithfulness to save is promised only to those who continue to place their faith in Him<\/em>.<\/p>\n In the book of Hebrews, we are warned about the hardening and deceiving effects of sin (3:13). Unrepentant sin can eventually lead a person to reject their faith in God and become His enemy instead. The point is not that we can sin so much that God will reject us, but that there is the risk that we will go on sinning in such a way that we will reject God (3:12-19; 6:4-8; 10:26-31).<\/p>\n We have already mentioned the state of some of the brethren in Galatia. They had \u201cfallen from grace,\u201d not by virtue of unrepentant sin but by placing their faith in their own righteous deeds, rather than in the sacrificial death of Christ. Their acceptance of a false gospel, built on their obedience to the law, severed them from Christ and thus resulted in apostasy.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n The biblical doctrine, then, is that God is ever faithful to save those who trust Him. For those who love and believe in Him, nothing can separate us from His love (Romans 8:31-39), and no one can snatch us from His hand (John 10:25-30). We can have full assurance of our salvation. Our assurance is not based on completely avoiding sin or on perfect adherence to the law, but on the reception and knowledge of the Son, in whom we have eternal life (17:3; 1 John 5:11-13). God will not go back on His promise, and He is ever faithful. However, His promise of salvation is for those who believe \u2014 indeed, for those who persevere in believing<\/em>. This perseverance is not an automatic, predestined response to God\u2019s grace, as Calvinists would have it. Rather, it is a daily call to place our trust in God\u2019s amazing grace.<\/p>\n And yet, we cannot end with this. We are touching on a great mystery when we speak of God\u2019s grace. By God\u2019s grace we are invited to place our faith in Him, and by God\u2019s grace we continue to place our faith in Him. Scripture does not present this grace as irresistible, but it does present it as persistent, persuasive, and winsome. R. E. O. White shares wise words regarding the relationship between faith and grace:<\/p>\n Every devout Christian knows that he would not have continued in the faith (as also he would never have begun) but for the unmerited, invasive grace of God, shown to him in innumerable ways. . . . If we fall, we know that is our fault; if we are upheld, we know it is thanks to God\u2019s grace. The warnings, exhortations, and tragic examples of the NT do still speak directly to our hearts; had it depended upon us, our waywardness would long ago have snatched us out of God\u2019s hands, separated us from God\u2019s love. But it has not depended upon anything in us, except our desire to be saved<\/em> (italics mine).<\/p>\n We work out our salvation in fear and trembling, knowing all the while that it is God who is working in us, both to will, and to do, according to His good pleasure (Philippians 2:13, 14). By trusting in God\u2019s grace, we believe, and by trusting in His grace, we persevere.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Here we come to the end of our three-part discussion of the Calvinist TULIP. Looking back, we see that total depravity was easy to affirm, as the Bible is explicit in describing humankind\u2019s inability to merit salvation through works. Conversely, unconditional election was easy to denounce, as receiving the benefit of election in Scripture is […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":240,"featured_media":4783,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"sync_status":"","episode_type":"","audio_file":"","castos_file_data":"","podmotor_file_id":"","cover_image":"","cover_image_id":"","duration":"","filesize":"","filesize_raw":"","date_recorded":"","explicit":"","block":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[37],"tags":[1350,233,184,816,1349],"yoast_head":"\nI is for Irresistible<\/h2>\n
\n1) God has unconditionally elected and predestined some to receive His grace through faith (i.e., limited atonement). 2) The predetermined will of God cannot be resisted or rejected. 3) Therefore, those who have been predestined to receive grace through faith cannot do otherwise.<\/p>\nResistible grace<\/h2>\n
P is for Perseverance<\/h2>\n
Faithful Father<\/h2>\n