{"id":4584,"date":"2018-04-25T14:25:04","date_gmt":"2018-04-25T14:25:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/baonline.cog7engage.net\/?p=4584"},"modified":"2023-08-29T11:22:27","modified_gmt":"2023-08-29T17:22:27","slug":"biblical-inspiration","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/baonline.cog7engage.net\/biblical-inspiration\/","title":{"rendered":"Biblical Inspiration: Authority of Scripture Part 3"},"content":{"rendered":"

Part three in the Biblical Authority<\/a> series provides answers \u2014 and raises questions.<\/p>\n

In this series, we\u2019re looking at the issues involved in the authority of Scripture<\/a>. We first examined revelation<\/em><\/a>, addressing the challenge of how we know the Bible is from God and reveals God. Now we turn to biblical inspiration, which is the problem of communication<\/em>. How did God get the message into the text?<\/p>\n

Inspired writers?<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Many Christians do not believe that God literally caused the words of the Bible to be written in the way that they were. Some hold the intuition<\/em> theory<\/em> of inspiration: The writers were people gifted with more than usual insight in much the same way as Buddha and Socrates were. In short, these writers had a talent for theology and expressing their ideas. Others hold to the illumination<\/em> theory<\/em>. This view says that inspiration was accomplished as God expanded the writers\u2019 natural abilities. A third view, held by some conservative Christian scholars, is that God put the thoughts into the writers\u2019 minds and that the writers expressed these thoughts in their own way. It\u2019s known as the dynamic theory of inspiration<\/em>.<\/p>\n

These views are attractive to many, allowing them to deal with the difficult scriptures in an easier way because they are more human products than God\u2019s.<\/p>\n

Consider the problems arising from views like these. What good and how trustworthy would heightened intuition, general illumination, or even God\u2019s thoughts be if just left to human writers to express in their own way? For starters, how would writers discern God\u2019s thoughts from their own? Further, even if they could delineate a difference, how confident could they be in accurately explaining God\u2019s intention? Our view of inspiration holds that it was not so much the writers<\/em> who were inspired in some general way, but the result \u2014 the writings<\/em> themselves \u2014 were inspired by God (2 Timothy 3:16).<\/p>\n

Inspired writings<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Let\u2019s start with 2 Peter 1:20, 21. Some think this passage speaks only of inspired writers, but let\u2019s look closer:<\/p>\n

Knowing this first, that no prophecy of Scripture is of any private interpretation, for prophecy never came by the will of man, but holy men of God spoke as they were moved by the Holy Spirit.<\/p>\n

Verse 20 assures us that the inspired writing we call Scripture did not arise from private interpretation. It\u2019s not something that somebody thought God wanted them to say. The word Scripture<\/em> itself refers to something written, and Peter seems to say that Scripture isn\u2019t privately authored. This means that the writers were not writing from their own meanings. They were not allowed by God to resort to their own views.<\/p>\n

Does that mean that God simply dictated the Bible to them? Yes, sometimes we see divine dictation. Think of the many times the Bible says, \u201cThus saith the Lord\u201d or \u201cThe word of the Lord came to me and said. . . .\u201d Much of the prophets\u2019 messages came in this way, but there\u2019s more to it than that.<\/p>\n

Look at verse 21 again. God\u2019s Word didn\u2019t come by the \u201cwill of man\u201d but \u201choly men of God spoke as they were moved<\/em> by the Holy Spirit\u201d (emphasis mine). The Greek word translated \u201cmoved\u201d is used dozens of times in the New Testament for directing something by force. The word was based on the idea of a ship at sea moved by the wind. This moving doesn\u2019t refer to somebody being inspired in the general, weak sense, but to being born along or propelled<\/em> in a specific direction. This high view of inspiration finds the holy men of God in full submission to the overpowering guidance and superintendence of the Holy Spirit.<\/p>\n

It makes sense that God would have moved the writers in this way. We don\u2019t have to worry about the writers resorting to their own views, or getting mixed up, since the Holy Spirit wasn\u2019t just inspiring writers, but the very writings themselves. The writers\u2019 imperfections had nothing to do with the final result. Whether a writer was sleepy or sick the day he wrote it had no effect on the outcome. What was written is what God wanted. He made sure that every writer wrote exactly what he was supposed to. No wonder Psalm 119:89 tells us that \u201cFor ever, O Lord, thy word is established in heaven\u201d (KJV).<\/p>\n

It appears that not just the words were inspired. Even the very marks on the words were. Jesus says that not one jot will fail (Matthew 5:18). In the Hebrew, jot <\/em>is yoth<\/em>, the smallest letter in the Hebrew alphabet \u2014 like our apostrophe. Not even the smallest part of a word will pass away, He says, until it\u2019s all complete.<\/p>\n

Second Timothy 3:16 is the Bible\u2019s clearest and strongest statement on inspiration: \u201cAll Scripture is given by inspiration of God.\u201d All of it! And the words themselves, not just the means. There are only three words in that clause in the original Greek: all<\/em>, writings<\/em>, and a compound word that literally means \u201cGod-breathed.\u201d The New International Version <\/em>captures the force of its literal sense: \u201cAll Scripture is God-breathed. . . .\u201d<\/p>\n

Of course, when 2 Peter and 2 Timothy were penned, Scripture referred primarily to the Old Testament. But there is good reason to believe that even at this early point, the New Testament writings were considered Scripture. We note that \u201cthe other Scriptures\u201d in 2 Peter 3:16 (NIV) suggest that Paul\u2019s epistles were already being read as Scripture. And 1 Timothy 5:18 quotes Luke 10:7, calling it Scripture.<\/p>\n

[bctt tweet=”Since all the Bible is God breathed, each word is precious and each is trustworthy. – Gordon Feil”]<\/p>\n

Trustworthy words<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Since all the Bible is God breathed, \u201cEvery word of God is pure\u201d (Proverbs 30:5), even as God used all sorts of agents and methods of communicating these words to us. Each word is precious and each is trustworthy.<\/p>\n

In the previous article in this series, we discussed that the Bible is God\u2019s revelation<\/a>. We see now how<\/em> God used specific words through chosen writers to do that revealing. Next time we\u2019ll look at how the books of the Bible were recognized as Scripture.<\/p>\n

\n

Read the rest of the series:<\/p>\n